Contain What the Evidence Supports. Verify What Changed. Watch for the Return Path.
Aegisify brings response and recovery into one application-security lifecycle so a containment decision does not become the end of the investigation. Evidence-backed actions are reviewed in context, consequential execution stays authorization-gated, postconditions are checked after execution, and monitored recurrence can return a case to active investigation.
& RecoveryEvidence stays attached
Detect → Investigate → Respond → Verify → Watch for Recurrence
Separating response from recovery creates an artificial handoff. Aegisify keeps the containment record, execution outcome, verification state, supporting investigation, and recurrence evidence connected.
Aegisify Does Not Need to Invent an Action for Every Alert
A response proposal is useful only when the monitored evidence identifies a supported target and the expected operational effect can be explained before execution.
Digital Intelligence can turn eligible incident evidence into a containment proposal tied to one monitored application domain and one exact target. The current response catalog includes supported actions for suspicious inbound request sources, outbound destinations, application credentials, application sessions, application components, scheduled tasks, suspicious application resources, and non-owner application identities when the required Aegisify control is connected.
Each proposal preserves the reason for the action, target scope, response level, expected effect, potential business impact, reversibility, execution history, and related recovery state. If deterministic evidence does not support a containment proposal, the queue can remain empty rather than filling the interface with speculative actions.
Different Actions Need Different Approval Boundaries
Digital Intelligence distinguishes monitoring, narrowly pre-authorized protection, owner-approved response, and manual-only work instead of treating every security action as equivalent.
Monitor
Recommendation and visibility only. Nothing consequential executes while the response policy is in monitor mode.
Best for observation, investigation, and evidence collection without automated containment.
Protect
Only exact temporary protections that the customer has explicitly pre-authorized and that the connected Agent has confirmed through policy synchronization are eligible.
Current pre-authorizable controls are intentionally narrow rather than a blanket automation switch.
Owner Approval
An authorized owner reviews the evidence, exact target, expected effect, business impact, and recovery path before the action can execute.
Designed for consequential changes where accountable human review matters.
Manual
High-impact or unsupported work stays outside Digital Intelligence automated execution.
The platform can preserve investigation context without pretending every remediation should be automated.
Check the Target Again Before Acting on an Earlier Observation
Security evidence can be correct when collected and stale by the time an action is approved. Aegisify rechecks current state to reduce the risk of executing against a target that has already changed.
Contain the Narrow Mechanism—Not the Whole Application
Availability depends on the evidence type, connected Aegisify controls, current application state, customer policy, and authorization level.
Temporary request-source protection
When supported WAF evidence identifies an exact request source, Digital Intelligence can propose a temporary source block. Shared-source business impact remains visible before approval.
Temporary destination protection
For supported application egress evidence, an exact destination can be proposed for temporary blocking, with the integration impact and restoration path stated before action.
Credential and session containment
Eligible evidence can support revoking an exact application credential, terminating sessions for an affected identity, or suspending a non-owner application identity when the required control path is available.
Component and scheduled-task containment
Evidence tied to an exact application component or scheduled task can support deactivation or removal proposals rather than a broad application shutdown.
Suspicious resource quarantine
When the connected Shield control supports the exact resource and the evidence is sufficient, Digital Intelligence can propose moving that application resource into the quarantine flow.
Action-specific rollback guidance
Reversible actions identify how the exact protection can be removed or restored. Irreversible actions state what must be recreated or reauthenticated instead of presenting a fake rollback promise.
“Executed” Is Not the Same Thing as “Recovered”
After a supported containment action completes, Aegisify creates a recovery-verification record and checks the expected postcondition for that action. A revoked credential should no longer be present. Terminated sessions should show no active sessions for the targeted identity. A blocked destination or request source should report the expected blocked state. A disabled component should no longer be active. A quarantined resource should be quarantined or absent.
If the current state cannot be verified, recovery remains degraded or unverified. The platform does not convert an unavailable check into “fixed.”
If the Same Behavior Returns, Recovery Should Not Stay Green
Aegisify watches the post-containment evidence ledger for action-specific signs that the targeted behavior or mechanism returned.
When recurrence is observed, the related investigation can return to an investigating state and the recurrence evidence stays directly linked to the containment history. That preserves the operational story: what was contained, what was verified, and what later came back.
Verification Inherits the Health of the Evidence Used to Verify It
A quiet recovery window is meaningful only when the relevant evidence channels are healthy enough to support the conclusion.
Common Questions About Digital Intelligence Response
Can Aegisify automatically execute every recommended response?
No. The response model deliberately separates monitor-only recommendations, narrowly pre-authorized temporary protections, owner-approved consequential actions, and manual-only work. The exact action must also be supported by current evidence and the connected control path.
Can AI approve or execute containment?
No. AI can assist with evidence explanation and recommendations, but consequential execution remains controlled by deterministic policy, current target state, and authorized response boundaries.
What happens if the target changes before approval?
The response flow rechecks current target state before execution. A stale or mismatched state should fail visibly rather than applying an old decision to a changed target.
Does a successful command mean the incident is resolved?
No. Execution is followed by action-specific postcondition verification and monitored recurrence. Recovery remains separate from the simple fact that a command was accepted.
What does the 72-hour window prove?
It supports a bounded statement about whether related recurrence was observed during the monitored recovery window when the necessary evidence channels remained available. It is not a guarantee that the entire application or infrastructure is clean.
How can Aegisify AI help?
Ask about Aegisify or WordPress: errors, plugins, security, SEO, compatibility, troubleshooting, comparisons, or launch a free website scan.
