Sample WordPress Security Audit Report: What Aegisify Audit Helps You See
A WordPress Security Audit report should do more than list alerts. It should help you understand what was checked, which issues matter, what evidence supports each finding, and what should be fixed first.
This sample report shows the type of structure a buyer can expect from a professional Aegisify Audit workflow using public exposure checks, Agent data, plugin security review, SAST-style signals, DAST-style evidence, logs, and AI-assisted prioritization. This is a sanitized example and does not expose customer data.
Aegisify Facts & Truth
Executive Summary
| Report Area | Sample Summary |
|---|---|
| Site | example.com |
| Audit Type | WordPress Security Audit with Agent-assisted review |
| Primary Risk | Plugin security exposure, missing hardening controls, suspicious activity patterns, and public route visibility. |
| Recommended Action | Review high-priority findings first, validate plugin updates in staging, tighten access controls, review logs, and rerun scan after remediation. |
Sample Risk Snapshot
| Risk Level | Sample Finding Type | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| High | Outdated plugin with known vulnerability signal | An outdated component can increase exposure if a known issue applies to the installed version. |
| High | Suspicious file or code pattern | Unexpected code can indicate a plugin issue, manual change, or potential compromise that needs review. |
| Medium | Security header gap | Missing headers can weaken browser-side protections and increase exposure to common web risks. |
| Medium | REST API route visibility | Visible routes may be expected, but sensitive routes should be reviewed for authentication and authorization behavior. |
| Review | Log activity pattern | Repeated admin actions, failed logins, or plugin changes may require investigation depending on business context. |
What the Report Should Include
- Scope: domain, scan profile, Agent status, and scan date.
- Scan types: external scan, DAST-style checks, SAST-style review, plugin security, dependency review, logs, and AI analysis.
- Findings: severity, evidence summary, business impact, and remediation priority.
- Top risks: the most important items to review first.
- Remediation plan: practical next steps that can be reviewed by a human administrator or developer.
- Retest guidance: what to verify after fixes are applied.
Sample Finding Format
| Field | Sample Content |
|---|---|
| Finding | Outdated plugin detected |
| Category | Plugin Security |
| Evidence | Installed version appears older than the latest available version. Validate against the plugin vendor and test update in staging. |
| Impact | Outdated plugins may expose the site to known vulnerabilities, compatibility issues, or operational instability. |
| Recommended Action | Back up the site, test update in staging, apply update, review logs, and rerun the audit scan. |
How AI Helps the Report
Artificial Intelligence can help summarize long scan results, connect patterns across logs and findings, identify which items may deserve priority, and explain the likely business impact in plain language.
AI does not replace human review. The safest workflow is to use AI-assisted guidance to understand the issue faster, then validate the recommendation before changing production systems.
What This Sample Report Does Not Show
- Real customer domains.
- Private logs or sensitive scan output.
- Exploit instructions.
- Guaranteed cleanup claims.
- Guaranteed security or ranking outcomes.
Why This Report Matters
A WordPress site can look healthy while still carrying plugin risk, weak configuration, exposed routes, hidden activity, outdated dependencies, or suspicious file changes. Aegisify Audit helps turn those signals into a report that owners, agencies, and technical teams can actually use.
Get Your Own WordPress Security Audit Report
Run a Free Scan or sign up for Aegisify Audit to generate a clearer WordPress security picture using SAST, DAST-style checks, plugin security review, logs, Agent data, and AI-assisted remediation guidance.