Operate the Intelligence Service Without Mixing Administration With Security Conclusions
Digital Intelligence Administration brings service readiness and governance into one control area. It answers the operational questions behind the security workspace: Is the service entitled and provisioned? Which application domains are enabled? How is evidence retained? Who receives material security notifications? And what privacy boundaries apply to sensitive context and AI-assisted explanation?
Service Operations and Governance Belong Together—but They Answer Different Questions
Putting both under Administration keeps customer navigation clean while preserving the distinction between platform readiness and policy control.
Can Digital Intelligence run for this account and application?
Review entitlement, application-domain enrollment, dedicated tenant evidence-store readiness, provisioning state, service health, effective retention, and recent storage activity.
How should evidence and notifications be governed?
Review effective retention, Root Account retention authority, evidence holds, security notification recipients, incident-severity alerts, operational security signals, privacy boundaries, and AI evidence minimization.
Entitlement Is a Service State—not a Security Verdict
Digital Intelligence keeps administrative readiness separate from live evidence health so an active service cannot be mistaken for complete visibility.
Bind Digital Intelligence to the Applications That Are Actually in Scope
The service operates at the account and application-domain boundary rather than assuming every eligible domain is automatically enrolled.
Keep Service Storage Readiness Visible
Digital Intelligence uses a dedicated tenant evidence-store model for customer intelligence data. Administration exposes the operational state of that store without treating database availability as a security finding.
Operational readiness can include provisioning state, storage binding state, schema readiness, latest successful tenant write, recent accepted batch/event activity, telemetry volume, and any provisioning or storage failure that prevents the evidence layer from being queried safely.
If the evidence store is unavailable, Aegisify should say that visibility cannot be verified. It should not translate storage failure into “no incidents.”
Make Retention an Explicit Governance Decision
The active subscription establishes the normal retention authority. Governance then makes the effective customer policy visible and auditable.
Plan-defined retention
The active entitlement establishes the normal evidence-retention window for the account.
Shorter customer override
The primary Root Account owner can choose a shorter effective retention window. The customer override cannot extend storage beyond the active subscription authority.
Active evidence holds
Evidence placed on an active hold remains preserved beyond normal expiry until the hold is released.
Choose Which Material Security Signals Should Generate Customer Email
Notification policy changes email behavior—not whether Digital Intelligence continues collecting evidence, creating investigations, or showing security state in the application.
Severity-based case notifications
Customers can govern whether material investigation changes at selected severities should trigger Digital Intelligence email notification.
Approval required
Notify accountable recipients when a deterministic containment proposal is waiting for the required owner decision.
Related recurrence
Notify when monitored evidence shows related activity returning after a containment action.
Coverage degraded
Notify when implemented telemetry-health conditions indicate stale or degraded evidence visibility.
Configured recipients are customer-controlled within the product’s administrative rules, and the primary account authority remains part of the governance model. Invalid recipient data is rejected instead of silently turning a security notification policy into an unknown delivery configuration.
Keep High-Impact Governance With the Root Account Owner
Digital Intelligence distinguishes ordinary access from the authority to change customer-wide retention and notification policy.
Use Context Without Turning Security Enrichment Into Raw Customer-Data Collection
Administration makes the data-handling intent visible because sensitive context and AI-assisted explanation need explicit boundaries.
Sensitive Data context
The Sensitive Data Map is designed around classification/context metadata and one-way resource fingerprints rather than copies of raw customer records merely for enrichment.
High-risk values stay outside the enrichment goal
The implementation explicitly states that raw payment-card data, CVV values, secrets, and entire customer records should not be collected simply to enrich Digital Intelligence context.
AI evidence minimization
Evidence-constrained AI explanation uses minimized, sanitized deterministic incident context under a strict redaction profile rather than treating the entire tenant evidence store as a prompt.
AI remains interpretation
AI output is explanatory context. It is not immutable evidence, it does not overwrite the evidence record, and it is not independent remediation authority.
Know Which Page Should Answer Which Question
Common Questions About Service and Governance
Does an active Digital Intelligence license mean telemetry is healthy?
No. Entitlement and provisioning establish service authority and storage readiness. Sensor coverage and evidence-pipeline health are separate operational facts and can still be degraded or unavailable.
Can the customer extend retention beyond the active subscription?
The current governance model allows the primary Root Account owner to choose a shorter retention override. It does not use that override to extend retention beyond the active subscription authority. Active evidence holds can preserve held evidence beyond normal expiry until release.
Do notification settings stop evidence collection?
No. Notification policy governs selected Digital Intelligence email signals. Evidence collection, investigation creation, and in-product visibility continue according to the service and evidence controls.
Who can change Digital Intelligence governance?
The current implementation reserves retention, notification recipients, and alert selections for the primary Root Account owner rather than treating every logged-in user as a governance administrator.
Does Administration control all automated response?
No. Response execution is governed by its own implemented authorization, policy synchronization, target validation, and response-level controls. Administration should not become a UI-only bypass around those enforcement points.
How can Aegisify AI help?
Ask about Aegisify or WordPress: errors, plugins, security, SEO, compatibility, troubleshooting, comparisons, or launch a free website scan.
